🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, such directives carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and later bin him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.